Do Vaccines Include Aborted Fetus Cells or DNA? COVID Vaccines Too?

by Oct 1, 2021Abortion, News in General

Melissa Strickler, a courageous Christian, whistleblower, and the manufacturing quality advisor at Pfizer, recently came forward with insider emails in which Pfizer officials tell their employees…

“We want to avoid having the information on the fetal cells floating out there.”

“One or more cell lines with an origin that can be traced back to human fetal tissue has been used in laboratory tests associated with the vaccine program.”

“The HEK293T cells are ultimately derived from an aborted fetus.”

Despite Many Claims Vaccine Ingredients are Slowly Becoming Known.

All of the Currently Approved COVID-19 shots are connected to the abortion industry. 

(As of this writing 10/25/2021)

By far my biggest reason to refuse these horrid jabs is that they are all connected with the abortion industry. This is indisputably anti-life.

LifeSite’s John-Henry Westen shares some clips of Stanley Plotkin’s 9-hour testimony before the U.S. Senate. Plotkin reluctantly admitted that over 70 babies’ corpses were used in the process of finding the two cell lines that would be used in a number of vaccines. Some people say that since these cell lines, obtained in the 1970s, are so distantly connected to abortion as to be untainted, it’s okay to get the vaccines. But the fact is that new cell lines are being developed all the time, because cell lines die out eventually and there aren’t enough of them for all the research “scientists” want to do.

Pamela Acker is a biologist and researcher who explains the horrors of the abortions done to obtain material for medical research — including researching, testing, and manufacturing vaccines. These innocent children are delivered via Caesarian section. Their tissues are harvested from them while they are still alive and without benefit of anesthesia, since that would damage the usefulness of the tissues. WI-38, MRC-5, HEK-293, PER C-6 are some of the cell lines that are currently used in the manufacture of various vaccines.

The Johnson & Johnson injection contains DNA fragments from aborted babies. The Moderna and Pfizer injections were tested on aborted fetal tissue. They are all created at the expense of an innocent child. I cannot and will not be a party to such barbarism.

WARNING: Here’s a Great Example of How “Fake News” is Propagated by Main Stream Media Outlets.

Reuters’ article “Fact Check – J&J’s COVID-19 vaccine does not contain aborted fetal cells” follows a classic approach taken in many areas: set up a straw man, or several even, and then destroy them — argument won, case closed. Except it’s not.

Straw men

  1. In the article the statement is made that the vaccine “does not contain aborted fetal cells” — this is a straw man because no academic ever says they do.
  2. The article debunks the statement that “the first ingredient in the list is aborted fetal DNA”. This is a straw man because it doesn’t matter the position on the list, or even whether it is listed! The real question is, is any DNA from the aborted fetus in there?

In the article Jake Sargent asserts: “the vaccine does not contain ‘aborted fetal DNA’.” But does he mean what you think by this?

False distinctions & remoteness

To quote from the article again: “Fetal cell lines (not fetal tissue)… thousands of times removed from the original fetus cells, becoming known as fetal cell lines.”

For a start, no healthy cell can go far past the “Hayflick Limit” (approximately 50±10 passages/cell divisions), so a 1,000th passage cell is either utter fiction or else rather dangerous for vaccine usage (100% tumorigenicity1 is hit at 65th passage with cell line HEK 2932). In other words, after the cells have divided 65 times they are guaranteed to form tumors.

Also the seperation of fetal cell lines from fetal tissue seems somewhat dubious to me: whose DNA do they contain? Is it not essentially the murdered baby’s DNA? Perhaps slightly meddled with, but still their own — which is why Leonard Hayflick (and who can argue with him?) suggested the fetus’ estate had an interest in the commercial gain from cell lines.

I suspect it is this distinction that Jake Sargent has in mind when he says no “aborted fetal DNA” — it’s not the DNA that was found in the actual cells of the baby at time of harvesting. It’s DNA that was found in the subsequent (and in his mind distinct) cell line — where sometimes the DNA has been subtly tweaked to ‘immortalize‘ it, so the genome is not identical. You could argue on a technicality he’s right.

Bishop Athanasius Schneider on Abortion-Tainted Vaccines and the Culture of Death.

Featured Image
Bishop Athanasius Schneider speaks at the virtual Rome Life Forum, May 22, 2020.

April 1, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — Anti-Christian world powers that promote the culture of death are seeking to impose on the world’s population an implicit — though remote and passive — collaboration with abortion. Such remote collaboration, in itself, is also an evil because of the extraordinary historical circumstances in which these same world powers are promoting the murder of unborn children and the exploitation of their remains. When we use vaccines or medicines which utilize cell lines originating from aborted babies, we physically benefit from the “fruits” of one of the greatest evils of mankind — the cruel genocide of the unborn. For if one innocent child had not been cruelly murdered, we would not have these concrete vaccines or medicines. We should not be so naive as not to see that these vaccines and medicines not only offer a health benefit but also promise to promote the culture of death. Of course, some argue that even if people do not take these vaccines, the abortion industry will still continue. We may not reduce the number of abortions if we stop taking such vaccines or medicines, but this is not the issue. The problem lies in the moral weakening of our resistance to the crime of abortion, and to the crime of the trafficking, exploitation and commercialization of the body parts of murdered unborn children. The use of such vaccines and medicines in some way morally – albeit indirectly — supports this horrible situation. Observing the response from the Catholic Church, abortionists and those responsible for biomedical research will conclude that the hierarchy has acquiesced to this situation, which includes an entire chain of crimes against life and indeed can aptly be described as a “chain of death.” We have to wake up to the real dangers, consequences and circumstances of the current situation.

Theories justifying the use of abortion-tainted vaccines

The documents of the Holy See (from 2005, 2008 and 2020) that deal with vaccines developed from cell lines originating from murdered unborn children are not infallible decisions of the Magisterium. The arguments put forth in the aforementioned documents regarding the moral licitness of the use of abortion-tainted vaccines are ultimately too abstract. We need to approach this problem in a more profound way, and not remain in a juridical positivism and formalism of abstract theories of cooperation with evil, benefiting from the evil deeds of others, double effect or whatever one wishes to call such justifying theories.

We have to go deeper, down to the root, and consider the aspect of proportionality. This concrete chain of horrible crimes — of murdering, harvesting tissue and body parts from murdered unborn children, and commercializing their remains through the manufacturing and testing of vaccines and medicines — is out of all proportion to other crimes, e.g. benefitting from slave labor, paying taxes, etc. Even the most apparently impressive historical examples, which are sometimes adduced to justify the moral licitness of the use of abortion-tainted vaccines, are incomparable to the issue before us. Indeed, due to the gravity of abortion, and the current reality of an ever-expanding abortion and biomedical research industry, which involves the trafficking and exploitation of aborted baby body parts, the principle of material cooperation, or other similar theories, cannot be applied in this case. It is, therefore, highly anti-pastoral and counterproductive to allow the use of abortion-tainted vaccines in this historical hour. The souls of the murdered babies, from whose body parts people are now benefiting through these medicines and vaccines, are living and have a name before God.

When one uses an abortion-tainted vaccine, one is standing directly and very personally before the vaccine syringe. In paying taxes, one is not directly and personally confronting the process of a specific abortion. A government is not asking you concretely to give your money to “this” concrete act of abortion now. The government often uses our money against our will. Therefore, the use of an abortion-tainted vaccine is a much more personal confrontation, and a much closer meeting, with the monstrous crimes involved in its production, than for instance paying taxes or benefiting from the evil acts of another person. Should the government tell a citizen directly and personally, “I am taking your money to pay for this concrete abortion,” one has to refuse, even if it means confiscation of one’s home and imprisonment.

In the first centuries, Christians paid taxes to a pagan government, knowing that it would use a portion of the tax revenue to finance idol worship. However, when the government asked Christians personally and individually to participate in the crime of idolatry, by burning just a small grain of incense before the statue of an idol, they refused even at the price of being martyred for bearing witnesses to God’s First Commandment.

The exceptionally grave and unique character of abortion-tainted vaccines and medicines

How can we, with a maximum of determination, be and proclaim to be against abortion, when we accept abortion-tainted vaccines — when their origin lies in the murder of a child? Both logic and common-sense demand that we not accept such vaccines or medicines. In difficult times of great confusion, God often uses the simple and the little ones who tell the truth while the majority swims with the tide. Unfortunately, many people in the Church, and even some Catholic pro-life organizations, are swimming with the tide on the specific question of abortion-tainted vaccines and medicines. It seems that many theologians, and even the Holy See, as well as the vast majority of bishops, are also swimming with the tide, and there remains only a minority in the Church of our day which is saying, “Stop. This is not good. This is a danger!” As Christians, it is our duty to bear witness to the world by not accepting these vaccines and medicines.

Read the Entire Article at LifeSiteNews

A Glowing Enzyme Called “Luciferase sm 102” is a nano-partical that is included within the current Vaccines. To help spot antibody buildup. Interesting name…

Lipid Nanoparticle Technology

If the mRNA is the “message” of the vaccine, the lipid nanoparticle is the “envelope.” Lipid nanoparticles are created in the image of our own cell membranes, allowing them to travel within our bodies and fuse with human cells.

The lipid wall of the mRNA-1273 vaccine is made up of four different compounds:

  • SM-102 — a proprietary phospholipid that makes up the basic structure of the nanoparticle wall
  • DSPC — another commercially available phospholipid that will aid in the nanoparticle wall structure
  • Cholesterol — native to all of our cell membranes, cholesterol helps to add fluidity or stiffness to a cell membrane depending on temperature. The addition of cholesterol will aid in the stability of the nanoparticle.
  • PEG-2000 DMG — a lipid fused to polyethylene glycol with aids in the formation of the nanoparticle

Read the entire article here

"Doctor Ryan Cole, MD | What Is In the COVID-19 Vaccines?" by Clay Clark: